|
|
Call for an independent regulator for NHS
Oct 21, 2005, 15:51, Reviewed by: Dr.
|
|
�If these golden rules were met, the UK government would be more likely to carry the support of the public and NHS professionals to meet the healthcare challenges of the 21st century�
|
By BMJ,
The NHS should have an independent regulator like other public utilities in the UK, argues a senior doctor in this week�s BMJ. Many public utilities have independent regulators to see that commercial interests and unfair pricing do not disadvantage the public.
At present the UK does not have an independent regulator of healthcare reform, yet the consequences of ill judged reform of the NHS may inflict long term damage to the delivery of health care to its citizens, says Ian Kunkler, a consultant at the Western General Hospital in Edinburgh.
He believes that the shortcomings of the private finance initiative are persuasive arguments for an independent regulator, and suggests that key tests might include equity of access to care; collaboration between healthcare professionals, managers, and patients, and financial prudency and transparency.
�If these golden rules were met, the UK government would be more likely to carry the support of the public and NHS professionals to meet the healthcare challenges of the 21st century,� he concludes. 
- British Medical Journal Issue Dated 22 October 2005 (Vol 331, No 7522)
Read the full text of the research article at bmj.com
For any corrections of factual information, to contact the editors or to send
any medical news or health news press releases, use
feedback form
Top of Page
|
|
|
|
